Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Editorial Policies
    • Open Access
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Editorial Policies
    • Open Access
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
American Academy of Pediatrics
Review Article

Is Unplanned PICU Readmission a Proper Quality Indicator? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Gabriela J. Prutsky, Dipti Padhya, Ahmed T. Ahmed, Jehad Almasri, Wigdan H. Farah, Larry J. Prokop, M. Hassan Murad and Mouaz Alsawas
Hospital Pediatrics February 2021, 11 (2) 167-174; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2020-0192
Gabriela J. Prutsky
aDepartment of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, Minnesota;
bUnidad de Conocimiento y Evidencia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dipti Padhya
cPediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Cedar-Sinai Hospital, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ahmed T. Ahmed
dDepression Center, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jehad Almasri
eInternal Medicine, Piedmont Athens Regional Health System, Athens, Georgia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wigdan H. Farah
fInternal Medicine, St Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larry J. Prokop
gMayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Hassan Murad
hEvidence-Based Practice Center and Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mouaz Alsawas
hEvidence-Based Practice Center and Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    References flowchart.

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    Index admission characteristics: sensitivity analysis. Studies that included patients who were readmitted after 48 hours in the control arm were removed in our sensitivity analysis.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Study Characteristics

    Study, yCountryDesignSettingPopulationNEarly Unplanned Readmissions, n (%)Age, y
    Bernard et al,15 2013United StatesRetrospective cohortTertiary care pediatric academic hospitalPatients with ≥1 PICU admission during a single hospitalization; admissions to the cardiac intensive care team were excluded21270 (33.01)NR
    Czaja et al,12 2013United StatesRetrospective cohort73 PICUs in VPS (2005–2008); most were academic centers with an accredited pediatric residency programAll patients admitted to the PICU; children who died on their first admission or who were directly discharged from the ICU were excluded37981499 (39.47)NR
    De Kroon et al,16 2013NetherlandsCase-controlChildren’s hospitalAll patients admitted to the PICU33681024 (NA)NR
    Edwards et al,13 2013United StatesRetrospective cohort90 North American PICUs in VPS (2009–2011)All patients admitted to the PICU95 0281161 (1.22)0–18
    Kaur et al,14 2018United StatesCase-controlAcademic children’s hospital with a 16-bed mixed medical-surgical unitAll patients (0–17 y) who required unscheduled readmission to the PICU within 48 h were included. Controls were selected randomly from all patients who did not require readmission.25686 (NA)3.75 (0.8–10.1)a
    Khan et al,17 2014PakistanRetrospective cohortPICU and step-down unit at a university hospitalPediatric patients <15 y102224 (2.34)4.07 (0–8.49)b,c
    Kotsakis et al,18 2016CanadaCase-controlAcademic pediatric hospital with all subspecialty services availablePatients (index discharge) who survived to PICU discharge and were discharged to hospital wards6370135 (NA)5.27 (0.96–12.87)a
    Linton et al,19 2009AustraliaCase-controlChildren’s hospital with the largest PICU in the country; access to all medical and surgical pediatric subspecialtiesChildren discharged from ICU375114 (NA)3.65 (0–19)c
    Mandell et al,20 2015United StatesCase-controlTertiary care, academic, freestanding children’s hospitalAll patients ≤18 from the PICU to the pediatric ward; patients who were discharged directly from the PICU to home or transferred to another PICU were excluded18938 (NA)7.27 (1.4–14.3)a
    Odetola et al,21 2007United StatesCase-control (retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data)16-bed medical-surgical PICU and a 15-bed pediatric cardiac ICU at a tertiary care university children’s hospitalData collected prospectively within the PRISM III data8885711 (NA)2.93 (0.46–10.68)a
    Wagh et al,22 2013United KingdomCase-control (retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data)22-bed cardiac and general PICU with ∼1100 admissions per yearPICU episodes were evaluated; no further details provided9471330 (NA)NR
    • NA, not available; NR, not reported; PRISM, Pediatric Risk of Mortality; VPS, Virtual Pediatric ICU Performance Systems.

    • ↵a Median (interquartile range).

    • ↵b Information only available for the patients who were readmitted.

    • ↵c Mean (range).

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Methodologic Quality Assessment

    StudyDesignSelectionComparability of Cases and Controls Based on Design or AnalysisExposure
    Is the Case Definition Adequate?Are the Cases Representative?Is the Control Definition Adequate?Was the Control Selection Appropriate?Ascertainment of ExposureSame Method of Ascertainment for Cases and ControlsNonresponse Rate
    Bernard et al,15 2013Retrospective cohortYes, based on medical recordsYes, consecutive patientsPatients admitted to the same PICU who required readmission >48 h laterHospital controlsYes, per designYes, based on secure recordsYes0
    Czaja et al,12 2013Retrospective cohortYes, based on secure database informationYes, consecutive patientsPatients admitted to the same PICUs who required readmission >48 h laterHospital controlsYes, per designYes, based on secure recordsYes0
    De Kroon et al,16 2013Case-controlYes, based on secure medical recordsYesYes, no history of PICU readmissionPatients admitted to the same PICU who did not require readmissionYes, per designYes, based on secure medical recordsYes0
    Edwards et al,13 2013Retrospective cohortYes, based on secure database informationYesYes, no history of PICU readmissionPatients admitted to the PICUs (same database) who did not require readmissionYes, per designYes, based on secure recordsYes0
    Kaur et al,14 2018Case-controlYes, based on secure database informationYesYes, no history of PICU readmissionControls were selected randomly from all patients who did not require readmissionYes, per designYes, based on secure medical recordsYes0
    Khan et al,17 2014Retrospective cohortYes, based on secure medical recordsYesYes, no history of PICU readmissionPatients discharge from the PICU to the step-down unit who did not require readmission to the PICUYes, per designYes, based on secure medical recordsYes0
    Kotsakis et al,18 2016Case-controlYes, source of information unclearYesYes, no history of PICU readmissionPatients admitted to the same PICU who did not require readmissionYes, per designYes, based on secure medical recordsYes0
    Linton et al,19 2009Case-controlYes, based on secure medical recordsYesYes, no history of PICU readmissionPatients admitted to the same PICU who did not require readmissionYes, per designYes, based on secure medical recordsYes0
    Mandell et al,20 2015Case-controlYes, based on secure medical recordsYesYes, no history of PICU readmissionPatients admitted to the same PICU who did not require readmission after being discharge to the pediatric wardYes, per designYes, based on secure medical recordsYes0
    Odetola et al,21 2007Case-controlYes, based on secure database informationYesYes, no history of PICU readmissionPatients admitted to the same PICU who did not require readmissionYes, per designYes, based on secure medical recordsYes0
    Wagh et al,22 2013Case-controlYes, based on secure database informationYesYes, patients discharged from the same PICU at different timeYes, patients from the same PICUYes, per designYes, based on secure recordsYes0
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Hospital Pediatrics: 11 (2)
Hospital Pediatrics
Vol. 11, Issue 2
1 Feb 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is Unplanned PICU Readmission a Proper Quality Indicator? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Is Unplanned PICU Readmission a Proper Quality Indicator? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Gabriela J. Prutsky, Dipti Padhya, Ahmed T. Ahmed, Jehad Almasri, Wigdan H. Farah, Larry J. Prokop, M. Hassan Murad, Mouaz Alsawas
Hospital Pediatrics Feb 2021, 11 (2) 167-174; DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0192

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Is Unplanned PICU Readmission a Proper Quality Indicator? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Gabriela J. Prutsky, Dipti Padhya, Ahmed T. Ahmed, Jehad Almasri, Wigdan H. Farah, Larry J. Prokop, M. Hassan Murad, Mouaz Alsawas
Hospital Pediatrics Feb 2021, 11 (2) 167-174; DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0192
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Impact of Malnutrition on Hospitalized Children With Cerebral Palsy
  • Providing Inpatient Medical Care to Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
Show more Review Article

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Critical Care
    • Critical Care
  • Administration/Practice Management
    • Risk Management
    • Administration/Practice Management
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors/Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Open Access
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • RSS Feeds
  • shopAAP
  • AAP.org
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics