Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
American Academy of Pediatrics
Brief Reports

Using Stakeholder Engagement to Develop a Hospital-Initiated, Patient-Centered Intervention to Improve Hospital-to-Home Transitions for Children With Asthma

Kavita Parikh, Pamela S. Hinds and Stephen J. Teach
Hospital Pediatrics June 2019, 9 (6) 460-463; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2018-0261
Kavita Parikh
Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pamela S. Hinds
Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen J. Teach
Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is emerging as a tool for clinician investigators to learn from patients, families, and health professionals to better design and implement interventions that are responsive to patient and family needs and preferences. In this article, we demonstrate that multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement can meaningfully influence intervention design. We present a model of efficient yet substantive engagement of parents and health professionals in developing a hospital-to-home transition intervention for children hospitalized with asthma. We engaged parents during the acute hospitalization with one-on-one interviews, and we used one-on-one interviews and focus groups to engage key health professionals to facilitate meaningful engagement. We worked with a group of selected parent advisory council members (composed of parents of children with asthma) to refine the information gained from the parents and health professionals. We found that multidimensional stakeholder engagement can meaningfully shape intervention development, and we hope that these tools can be used or adapted to other hospital-based quality improvement, education, or research efforts.

As part of the Affordable Care Act, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute was established in 2010 as an independent, nonprofit organization authorized by Congress to fund research that can help support patients and families to make well-informed decisions about their health care.1 As health care providers, we know that our patients and their families face complex decisions, which are often confusing, and sometimes traditional research (despite remarkable advances) has not been able to answer many of the questions that patients and families want answered. Stakeholder engagement is emerging as a tool for clinician investigators to learn from patients and their families to better design and implement programs or interventions that are responsive to their needs and preferences.2,3

With funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, we sought to develop and pilot an intervention to improve the hospital-to-home (H2H) transition for children hospitalized with asthma at Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, DC. The prevalence of asthma among children <17 years of age is higher in Washington, DC (14%)4 than nationwide (8.3%).5 For patients hospitalized for an asthma exacerbation, admission and the transition from H2H are disruptive and stressful for the whole family; for example, patients miss school, and parents miss work.6 In addition, the process of discharging a pediatric patient from an acute care facility is complex, and more than 20% of parents report problems in the transition from H2H.7 Problems in discharge transition, stemming from poor communication or disjointed continuity of care, may culminate in adverse events, unscheduled emergency department visits, or readmissions.8

Reducing asthma-related hospitalizations hinges in part on improving care coordination.7 History of asthma hospitalization in the past 12 months is the most significant independent predictor of early readmission.9 Therefore, targeting patients who are hospitalized for an asthma exacerbation can reduce future hospitalizations and reduce readmissions. Given the growing role of incorporating patient and family stakeholders in the development of scholarly questions, interventions, and outcomes,10–12 we sought to engage families and other key health professional stakeholders in the development of an H2H transition intervention for children hospitalized with asthma at our hospital. In this Brief Report, using an example of asthma care coordination, we describe our process of stakeholder engagement as well as how this crucial and important input shaped our intervention. We found that multidimensional stakeholder engagement is feasible and can meaningfully shape intervention development, and we hope that these tools can be used or adapted to other hospital-based quality improvement, education, or research efforts.

Methods: What We Did to Engage Our Stakeholders

Over a 6-month period (September 2016 to February 2017), our study team engaged families and health professionals involved in the care of children with asthma in the community we serve. In an earlier article, we detail the methods, interview tools, and analysis plans,13 and in this current article, we highlight how we used this information to inform our intervention. Our engagement approach consisted of 3 approaches to provide input to the team regarding intervention design, which we outline below. Institutional review board approval was obtained by the committee at Children’s National Medical Center.

Parent Engagement

Parent engagement consisted of one-on-one interviews of parents during the inpatient stay for their child who was admitted with an asthma exacerbation. Interviews were done at the bedside on the inpatient unit. In previous work from our study team, we had shown an attrition of interested parents if they were asked to come back to the hospital after discharge for an interview or focus group.14 Interviews were conducted with a semistructured interview guide, and the interviews were recorded and transcribed and subsequently analyzed by using content analysis approach.

Health Professional Engagement

Health professional engagement consisted of both one-on-one interviews as well as focus groups. On the basis of convenience, certain health professional groups, asthma educators, physicians (inpatient, outpatient, and specialist), and health payer interviews were conducted one-on-one. Payer interview was conducted over the phone, and all other health professional interviews or focus groups were done face-to-face. School nurses were interviewed in focus groups because this was preferred by them for convenience, and these focus groups were conducted at a local school. Again, interviews and focus groups were conducted with a semistructured interview guide that was adapted with learnings from previous interactions, and the interviews were recorded and transcribed and subsequently analyzed by using content analysis or descriptive thematic analysis.

Asthma Parent Advisory Council Meeting

A single face-to-face meeting was conducted in the hospital during the evening to share our findings with an established asthma parent advisory council (PAC) and invite their feedback. This stakeholder engagement was used to provide further parent perspective and validation on the findings we had previously gathered from the early parent and health professional engagement. After this meeting, we continued to engage the parents through e-mail.

In our engagement plan, we used 2 key strategies that supported success: purposeful inclusion of diverse health care professionals and method flexibility. As a team, we identified the key stakeholders in the H2H transition for a child with asthma. Engaging parents was central to our effort, but we also sought to engage other key stakeholders, including physicians, nurses, educators, and insurance payers. To successfully gather feedback from these groups, we had to be flexible in our research approach. For this reason, some interviews were conducted one-on-one, whereas others were focus groups.

Key Findings

Although the specific results from our stakeholder engagement have been recently published,13 we want to highlight the key findings in this Brief Report that directly supported our intervention development. We found that focused engagement strategies can provide invaluable insight into program design and execution, and we highlight 2 aspects of this work.

Engagement of Families During the Hospitalization Is Feasible and Informative

Although there are different approaches to family engagement, we found that approaching families while they are in the hospital with a child with an acute illness is practical once the child is stabilized and improving. We found that as the child was recovering from his or her asthma exacerbation, parents were amenable to discussing barriers and facilitators for discharge. Despite the stressful and disruptive nature of hospitalization, they were receptive to speaking with us, with few disruptions or competing responsibilities, perhaps because they had often adjusted their schedule to be with their sick child. In addition, during the acute episode of hospitalization, families were eager to share with us how to improve the H2H transition and to avoid future asthma exacerbations, possibly because of the stress of experiencing their child’s difficulty in breathing. Previous work at our institution has had varying success when parents were asked to return to the hospital for a focus group,14 even when compensation was provided, so this approach of engagement is encouraging.

Multidimensional Stakeholder Engagement Can Meaningfully Support Program and Intervention Development. Engagement of Families During the Hospitalization Is Feasible and Informative

Stakeholder engagement shaped our intervention in several ways (Fig 1). Through our parent engagement, we were able to uncover educational gaps in knowledge about asthma in terms of chronicity, activity limitation, and management of asthma.13 After engaging with the school nurses, we identified clear gaps in communication between the school nurses and the care team and the negative impact of this communication void on the care of the child in school. With clinician engagement, we appreciated some of the challenges with education during the actual hospitalization because the hospital visit is often an unexpected event, and families are often overwhelmed. And lastly, our discussions with an existing asthma PAC highlighted the need to improve medication access at the time of discharge, so we established processes to improve medications in hand at the time of discharge. Through different avenues of engagement with key stakeholders, we were able to improve the content, coordination, and processes of our intervention.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Stakeholder engagement process to support intervention design. Adapted from Shelef DQ, Rand C, Streisand R, et al. Using stakeholder engagement to develop a patient-centered pediatric asthma intervention. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(6):1512–1517.

Conclusions

The currently presented findings are the foundational work for our ongoing pilot randomized control trial aimed to improve the H2H transition for children hospitalized with asthma through stakeholder engagement to design a support program. In this model, engagement with patients and families is central to the development of our study program and intervention. Building on a framework published by Shelef et al,10 in this article, we want to provide an example to engage patients and families alongside other key stakeholders, including clinicians, educators, school nurses, and payers, in the development of patient-centered programs and interventions for children who are hospitalized. Too often research, education, and quality improvement teams overlook this source of crucial and valuable information, and we encourage study teams to consider this opportunity.

Acknowledgments

We thank Naja Fousheé, Jahmeilia Paul, and Damian Waters for contributions in conducting and facilitating stakeholder engagement as well as Deborah Quint Shelef for assistance in framing our stakeholder engagement approach.

Footnotes

  • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr Teach receives royalties from UpToDate, Inc for his role as a section editor and grant support from the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Dr Hinds receives grant support from the National Institutes of Health (National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, and National Institute of Nursing Research).

  • FUNDING: Dr Parikh was supported by grant K08HS024554 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

  • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. ↵
    Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Available at: www.pcori.org. Accessed November 9, 2018
  2. ↵
    1. Frank L,
    2. Forsythe L,
    3. Ellis L,
    4. et al
    . Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1033–1041
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Fleurence R,
    2. Selby JV,
    3. Odom-Walker K,
    4. et al
    . How the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute is engaging patients and others in shaping its research agenda. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):393–400
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Parikh K,
    2. Silver A,
    3. Patel SJ,
    4. Iqbal SF,
    5. Goyal M
    . Pediatric firearm-related injuries in the United States. Hosp Pediatr. 2017;7(6):303–312
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Akinbami LJ,
    2. Simon AE,
    3. Rossen LM
    . Changing trends in asthma prevalence among children. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1):e20152354
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Franck LS,
    2. Wray J,
    3. Gay C,
    4. Dearmun AK,
    5. Lee K,
    6. Cooper BA
    . Predictors of parent post-traumatic stress symptoms after child hospitalization on general pediatric wards: a prospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(1):10–21
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Auger KA,
    2. Kenyon CC,
    3. Feudtner C,
    4. Davis MM
    . Pediatric hospital discharge interventions to reduce subsequent utilization: a systematic review. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(4):251–260
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Forster AJ,
    2. Murff HJ,
    3. Peterson JF,
    4. Gandhi TK,
    5. Bates DW
    . The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):161–167
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Reznik M,
    2. Hailpern SM,
    3. Ozuah PO
    . Predictors of early hospital readmission for asthma among inner-city children. J Asthma. 2006;43(1):37–40
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Shelef DQ,
    2. Rand C,
    3. Streisand R,
    4. et al
    . Using stakeholder engagement to develop a patient-centered pediatric asthma intervention. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(6):1512–1517
    OpenUrl
    1. Sauers-Ford HS,
    2. Simmons JM,
    3. Shah SS
    ; H2O Study Team. Strategies to engage stakeholders in research to improve acute care delivery. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(2):123–125
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Fiks AG,
    2. Cutler M,
    3. Massey J,
    4. Bell LM
    . Partnering with parents to create a research advisory board in a pediatric research network. Pediatrics. 2018;142(5):e20180822
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Parikh K,
    2. Paul J,
    3. Fousheé N,
    4. Waters D,
    5. Teach SJ,
    6. Hinds PS
    . Barriers and facilitators to asthma care after hospitalization as reported by caregivers, health providers, and school nurses. Hosp Pediatr. 2018;8(11):706–717
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Kramer CB,
    2. LeRoy L,
    3. Donahue S,
    4. et al
    . Enrolling African-American and Latino patients with asthma in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned from 8 patient-centered studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(6):1600–1607
    OpenUrl
  • Copyright © 2019 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Hospital Pediatrics: 9 (6)
Hospital Pediatrics
Vol. 9, Issue 6
1 Jun 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Using Stakeholder Engagement to Develop a Hospital-Initiated, Patient-Centered Intervention to Improve Hospital-to-Home Transitions for Children With Asthma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Using Stakeholder Engagement to Develop a Hospital-Initiated, Patient-Centered Intervention to Improve Hospital-to-Home Transitions for Children With Asthma
Kavita Parikh, Pamela S. Hinds, Stephen J. Teach
Hospital Pediatrics Jun 2019, 9 (6) 460-463; DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0261

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Using Stakeholder Engagement to Develop a Hospital-Initiated, Patient-Centered Intervention to Improve Hospital-to-Home Transitions for Children With Asthma
Kavita Parikh, Pamela S. Hinds, Stephen J. Teach
Hospital Pediatrics Jun 2019, 9 (6) 460-463; DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0261
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods: What We Did to Engage Our Stakeholders
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Characteristics of Afebrile Infants ≤60 Days of Age With Invasive Bacterial Infections
  • Trends in Incidence of Nicotine Use Disorder Among Adolescents in the Pediatric Hospital, 2012–2019
  • A Cost Comparison of Infliximab Versus Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Refractory Kawasaki Disease Treatment
Show more Brief Reports

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Hospital Medicine
    • Hospital Medicine
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors/Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • RSS Feeds
  • shopAAP
  • AAP.org
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics