Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors/Reviewers
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Editorial Policies
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
American Academy of Pediatrics
Brief Report

Point Prevalence of Children Hospitalized With Chronic Critical Illness in the General Inpatient Units

Lindsay Rogozinski, Ashley Young, Christopher Grybauskas, Pamela Donohue, Renee Boss and Eric Biondi; on behalf of the PCCI collaborative
Hospital Pediatrics July 2019, 9 (7) 545-549; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2018-0208
Lindsay Rogozinski
aDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashley Young
aDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Grybauskas
bDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pamela Donohue
bDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renee Boss
bDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Biondi
bDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Children with medical complexity (CMC) have high rates of mortality and morbidity, prolonged lengths of stay, and use a disproportionately high amount of health care expenditures. A subset of children with CMC have chronic critical illness requiring even higher levels of clinical support and resource use. We aimed to describe the point prevalence of children hospitalized in general inpatient care units with pediatric chronic critical illness (PCCI).

METHODS: Point prevalence analysis across 6 pediatric tertiary medical centers in the United States on a “snapshot day” (May 17, 2017). On the day of sampling, a number of demographic, historical, and clinical descriptors were collected. A previously published definition of PCCI was used to establish inclusion criteria.

RESULTS: The point prevalence of patients with PCCI in general inpatient care units was 41% (232 out of 571). Of these, 91% (212 out of 232) had been admitted more than once in the previous 12 months, 50% (117 out of 232) had a readmission within 30 days of a previous admission, and 20% (46 out of 232) were oncology patients. Only 1 had a designated complex care team, and there were no attending physicians designated primarily for medically complex children.

CONCLUSIONS: Children with chronic critical illness, a subset of CMC, may make up a substantial proportion of pediatric patients hospitalized in general inpatient care units. There is a critical need to understand how to better care for this medically fragile population. In our data, it is suggested that resources should be allocated for PCCI in nonintensive care clinical areas.

Chronic critical illness (CCI) is a term described in adult literature to depict patients who survive acute critical illness but are unable to return to their previous state of health.1–3 Patients with CCI often suffer multiorgan dysfunction, are dependent on medical technology, and are highly resource intensive.2,3 Recently, the term CCI has been applied to the pediatric population as pediatric chronic critical illness (PCCI).4 Although there are limited published reports on PCCI, an increase in medical complexity has been linked to an increased frequency of multiple ICU admissions,5 hospitalization rates,5–7 and significant inpatient resource use.7–11

It may be difficult for hospitals to proportionately allocate resources without a clear understanding of where high–resource-intensive pediatric patients are cared for within the hospital (eg, general care floors, PICUs, NICUs, etc). Although children with medical complexity (CMC) have been found to represent more than half of pediatric intensive care admissions,4,5,12,13 our objective was to determine the point prevalence of PCCI on the general pediatric floors of 6 pediatric hospitals in the United States in patients not being cared for in the ICU setting.

Methods

Data were obtained on a single date, May 17, 2017, from a collaborative composed of 6 tertiary care pediatric referral centers experienced in the care of pediatric patients with complex illness. The date was mutually agreed on by investigators at all sites. Two centers were freestanding children’s hospitals, and 4 were embedded in university medical centers. Medical records of all children, except those hospitalized in psychiatric units, were screened on the study day to determine if they met the definition of PCCI, which was defined as a patient who, for the current hospitalization, (1) had been hospitalized in the NICU until 44 weeks’ postmenstrual age, spent >14 consecutive days in the PICU, had ≥2 hospitalizations in the past 12 months, or had been hospitalized for >180 days and (2) had ongoing dependence on technology (defined as tracheostomy, mechanical ventilation, any oxygen delivery system, surgical or nonsurgical feeding tubes, indwelling catheters, central lines, need for dialysis, intracranial shunts, history of organ or bone marrow transplant, or multiple organ system involvement [defined as a chronic medical problem in ≥2 organ systems that has already lasted, or was expected to last, >3 months]).4

Clinical Data

On the study day, hospitalized patients meeting PCCI criteria were identified. Patient variables for the current admission, including the number of hospitalizations over the previous 12 months (including the current admission), were recorded. Patients were labeled as oncologic if they had an active malignancy or sequelae of malignancy as the primary admitting diagnosis. Side-by-side comparison of oncologic and non-oncologic patients meeting criteria for PCCI on the general care floors were also investigated. Trained research assistants reviewed individual charts using a standardized tool for data collection.

Center Characteristics

The 6 referral centers provided self-reported data, such as a designated complex care team, complex care unit, distinction of general care from step-down units, and primary attending physicians for PCCI.

Data Analysis

The primary outcome assessed was the point prevalence of PCCI on inpatient (non-ICU) units across all 6 referral centers. This was obtained by calculating the number of children who met PCCI criteria in the general care units divided by the total number of patients hospitalized in the general care units on the study day. General care floors were distinguished from step-down units, and patients hospitalized in step-down units were excluded. Descriptive statistics characterized the study population; nonparametric statistics were used for between-group comparisons. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Point prevalence of patients meeting PCCI criteria not admitted to the ICU setting was 41% of the total general care unit census (232 out of 571) for the 6 centers. Of these, 80% (186 out of 232) were nononcologic patients. One of the 6 centers reported having a complex care team, and none reported having dedicated complex care attending physicians. No child was hospitalized in a step-down unit.

Of all general floor patients with PCCI, 1% (2 out of 232) was hospitalized in the NICU until >44 weeks' gestational age, 6% (14 out of 232) had a PICU stay longer than 14 days, 91% (212 out of 232) had been admitted at least twice (range: 2–26 hospitalizations) in the previous 12 months, and 4% (10 out of 232) had a length of stay >180 days. Additionally, 52% (120 out of 232) required ≥2 technology assistive devices, 93% (216 out of 232) had >1 organ system involved, and 50% (117 out of 232) had a previous hospitalization within 30 days of the current hospitalization. Significant differences were noted between nononcologic PCCI and oncologic PCCI with regards to time spent in the ICU, previous hospitalization within 30 days of the current hospitalization, use of ventilator support, number of systems affected, planned versus unplanned hospitalization, and number of current technologies. In Table 1, we describe additional characteristics of non-ICU patients with PCCI.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Characteristics of Non-ICU PCCI With and Without Oncologic Disease

Of the current technologies, more than half (56%) of patients with PCCI required the use of feeding tubes, the majority of which were surgically placed (37%). Other specific technologies included central venous catheters (47%), cranial shunts (7%), and respiratory support (30%) such as tracheostomies (11%) and ventilator or continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure support (10%). In this population, the most frequent chronically affected systems were gastrointestinal (69%), hematologic (43%), pulmonary (40%), and neurologic (38%).

Discussion

We found that on 1 day, chosen at random, roughly 40% of the children in the general care units at 6 pediatric referral hospitals met criteria for PCCI. The criteria allow for identification of highly resource-intensive patients at varying stages of illness, both in the ICU and on the general care floors. Thus, we suggest that hospitalized children who meet the definition of PCCI comprise a substantial portion of patients in general care pediatric units, despite their frequent intensive care needs and varying markers of severity.

In previous studies, it has been shown that children with multiple complex chronic conditions compared with children with no complex chronic conditions have up to threefold longer hospital length of stay, 11-fold increase in hospital charges, and a 15-fold increase of risk of inpatient death.7 Of all patients who met criteria for PCCI in this analysis, 91% had been admitted at least twice in the previous 12 months, and 52% required ≥2 technology assistive devices.

Understanding the point prevalence of PCCI on the general care floors is helpful, considering CMC comprise <1% of the pediatric population10 yet account for one-third of child health spending,10,14 80% of which is related to inpatient care.15,16 Special consideration should be made to the differences in unit capabilities where these patients are hospitalized (eg, ICU versus general floor setting) in conjunction with patient needs. Presumably, ICUs have a higher level of staffing, resources, and technology and respiratory support than the general care units. In our study, we also specifically present data regarding the subset of children with PCCI who do not have an oncologic diagnosis. Children with oncologic processes often have dedicated care teams or additional inpatient and/or outpatient resources beyond what may be available to other children hospitalized with PCCI.

Designated inpatient complex care teams and complex care coordination efforts seek to improve health outcomes between multiple providers, polypharmacy, and subspecialty involvement.17–21 Only 1 of the 6 hospitals in our study had a designated complex care team, and no hospital had designated attending physicians for medically complex children. As the number of children with medical complexities continues to rise, the need to learn how to provide optimal care for this delicate patient population is paramount. Although we did not determine which specialty was caring for patients with PCCI in this study, pediatric hospital medicine is considered an ideal field to manage complex care.18,22 Future research on how to best allocate resources to the general care services that are caring for a large percentage of PCCI may be necessary.

Limitations

Our study has limitations. First, the participating sites were all tertiary care medical centers, limiting the generalizability to smaller institutions or community-based hospitals. Second, there is likely variability among hospitals in terms of criteria for bed placement or ability to care for certain pediatric populations on general care floors rather than the ICU (eg, ventilator-supported patients). Third, our study day represents 1 chosen date, and an analysis performed on a different date or in a different season may yield different results, especially if patients with PCCI transfer to and from the ICU setting throughout an admission. And fourth, it is possible that patients who do not meet PCCI criteria require high levels of use, which may serve to underestimate the true resource need in the general care units.

Conclusions

We identified a substantial proportion of patients in the general care units who met criteria for PCCI. In future studies, researchers should provide a more-detailed examination of this population and examine whether this trend holds true in other facilities. This would allow hospitals to better allocate resources and optimize care for CMC and CCI.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to our colleagues in the PCCI Collaborative. The following centers and investigators, in addition to those listed as authors, participated in the study: Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC: Vanessa Madrigal, MD, and Julia Heneghan, MD, Department of Critical Care Medicine; Angela Burd, CPNP, Kevin Creamer, MD, Enrique Escalante, MD, Heidi Clark, NP, and Debbie A. Lafond, DNP, PPCNP-BC, Division of Hospital Medicine; Nickie Niforatos-Andescavage, MD, Division of Neonatology; and Miriam Bloom, MD, Division of Hospitalist Medicine. Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, Baltimore, Maryland: Alison Miles, DO, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine; Jennifer Shepard, RN, MBA, Division of Neonatology; Nancy Hutton, MD, Division of General Pediatrics; and Erin P. Williams, MBE, Berman Institute of Bioethics. Maryland Children’s Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland: Jennifer Dukes, CRNP, Division of Neonatology; and Nikki Brandon, MS, NNP-BC. Seattle Children’s at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington: Elliott Weiss, MD, MSME, Division of Neonatology; Jonna D. Clark, MD, MA, Division of Pediatric Critical Care; Mithya Lewis-Newby, MD, MPH, Division of Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care; Nicholas A. Vitanza, MD, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology; Brett Leggett, MD, Division of General Pediatrics and Hospital Medicine; and Aspen Miller, University of Washington. University of Minnesota Masonic Children’s Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota: Naomi Goloff, MD, Pediatric Palliative Care, Division of Hospital Medicine; Heather Podgorski, MD, Division of Neonatology; and Nicholas Brown, MD, Division of Pediatric Critical Care. University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi: Carrie M. Henderson, MD, and Laura Wright-Sexton, MD, Division of Pediatric Critical Care; Meghan Luter, MD, Department of Pediatrics; Emily Turbeville, Division of Newborn Medicine; and Mobolaji Famuyide, MD, Division of Neonatology.

Footnotes

  • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

  • FUNDING: No external funding.

  • POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr Biondi performs intermittent consultation for McKesson incorporated. The other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kahn JM,
    2. Le T,
    3. Angus DC,
    4. et al
    ; ProVent Study Group Investigators. The epidemiology of chronic critical illness in the United States*. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(2):282–287
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Nelson JE,
    2. Cox CE,
    3. Hope AA,
    4. Carson SS
    . Chronic critical illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(4):446–454
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Marchioni A,
    2. Fantini R,
    3. Antenora F,
    4. Clini E,
    5. Fabbri L
    . Chronic critical illness: the price of survival. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015;45(12):1341–1349
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Shapiro MC,
    2. Henderson CM,
    3. Hutton N,
    4. Boss RD
    . Defining pediatric chronic critical illness for clinical care, research, and policy. Hosp Pediatr. 2017;7(4):236–244
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Chan T,
    2. Rodean J,
    3. Richardson T,
    4. et al
    . Pediatric critical care resource use by children with medical complexity. J Pediatr. 2016;177:197–203.e1
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Burns KH,
    2. Casey PH,
    3. Lyle RE,
    4. Bird TM,
    5. Fussell JJ,
    6. Robbins JM
    . Increasing prevalence of medically complex children in US hospitals. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):638–646
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Simon TD,
    2. Berry J,
    3. Feudtner C,
    4. et al
    . Children with complex chronic conditions in inpatient hospital settings in the United States. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):647–655
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Berry JG,
    2. Agrawal R,
    3. Kuo DZ,
    4. et al
    . Characteristics of hospitalizations for patients who use a structured clinical care program for children with medical complexity. J Pediatr. 2011;159(2):284–290
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gold JM,
    2. Hall M,
    3. Shah SS,
    4. et al
    . Long length of hospital stay in children with medical complexity. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(11):750–756
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Cohen E,
    2. Berry JG,
    3. Camacho X,
    4. Anderson G,
    5. Wodchis W,
    6. Guttmann A
    . Patterns and costs of health care use of children with medical complexity. Pediatrics. 2012;130(6). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/130/6/e1463
  8. ↵
    1. Russell CJ,
    2. Simon TD
    . Care of children with medical complexity in the hospital setting. Pediatr Ann. 2014;43(7):e157–e162
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Edwards JD,
    2. Houtrow AJ,
    3. Vasilevskis EE,
    4. et al
    . Chronic conditions among children admitted to U.S. pediatric intensive care units: their prevalence and impact on risk for mortality and prolonged length of stay*. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(7):2196–2203
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Typpo KV,
    2. Petersen NJ,
    3. Petersen LA,
    4. Mariscalco MM
    . Children with chronic illness return to their baseline functional status after organ dysfunction on the first day of admission in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr. 2010;157(1):108–113.e1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Neff JM,
    2. Sharp VL,
    3. Muldoon J,
    4. Graham J,
    5. Myers K
    . Profile of medical charges for children by health status group and severity level in a Washington State Health Plan. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(1):73–89
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Berry JG,
    2. Hall M,
    3. Neff J,
    4. et al
    . Children with medical complexity and Medicaid: spending and cost savings. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(12):2199–2206
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Berry JG,
    2. Agrawal RK,
    3. Cohen E,
    4. Kuo DK
    . The Landscape of Medical Care for Children With Medical Complexity. Alexandria, VA; Overland Park, KS: Children’s Hospital Association; 2013
  14. ↵
    1. Glader L,
    2. Plews-Ogan J,
    3. Agrawal R
    . Children with medical complexity: creating a framework for care based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(11):1116–1123
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Simon TD,
    2. Mahant S,
    3. Cohen E
    . Pediatric hospital medicine and children with medical complexity: past, present, and future. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2012;42(5):113–119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. White CM,
    2. Thomson JE,
    3. Statile AM,
    4. et al
    . Development of a new care model for hospitalized children with medical complexity. Hosp Pediatr. 2017;7(7):410–414
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gordon JB,
    2. Colby HH,
    3. Bartelt T,
    4. Jablonski D,
    5. Krauthoefer ML,
    6. Havens P
    . A tertiary care-primary care partnership model for medically complex and fragile children and youth with special health care needs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(10):937–944
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Cohen E,
    2. Friedman J,
    3. Nicholas DB,
    4. Adams S,
    5. Rosenbaum P
    . A home for medically complex children: the role of hospital programs. J Healthc Qual. 2008;30(3):7–15
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Adame N,
    2. Rocha ME,
    3. Louden C,
    4. Agrawal R
    . Pediatric hospitalists’ perspectives on the care of children with medical complexity. Hosp Pediatr. 2011;1(1):30–37
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Copyright © 2019 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Hospital Pediatrics: 9 (7)
Hospital Pediatrics
Vol. 9, Issue 7
1 Jul 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Point Prevalence of Children Hospitalized With Chronic Critical Illness in the General Inpatient Units
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Point Prevalence of Children Hospitalized With Chronic Critical Illness in the General Inpatient Units
Lindsay Rogozinski, Ashley Young, Christopher Grybauskas, Pamela Donohue, Renee Boss, Eric Biondi
Hospital Pediatrics Jul 2019, 9 (7) 545-549; DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0208

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Point Prevalence of Children Hospitalized With Chronic Critical Illness in the General Inpatient Units
Lindsay Rogozinski, Ashley Young, Christopher Grybauskas, Pamela Donohue, Renee Boss, Eric Biondi
Hospital Pediatrics Jul 2019, 9 (7) 545-549; DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0208
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Limitations
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Secondary Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hospital Pediatrics
  • Identifying Children With Medical Complexity From the National Survey of Children’s Health Combined 2016–17 Data Set
  • Inpatient Treatment of Acute Otitis Media at a Pediatric Hospital: A Missed Teaching Opportunity for Antimicrobial Stewardship
Show more Brief Report

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Hospital Medicine
    • Hospital Medicine
  • Children With Special Health Care Needs
    • Children With Special Health Care Needs
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors/Reviewers
  • Author Guidelines
  • Reviewer Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • RSS Feeds
  • shopAAP
  • AAP.org
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics